Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota. Home page.
Home > Research > Forest Inventory and Management > Urban Forest Mapping

Urban Forest Mapping

Classifying land cover

The two land cover classification approaches included a pixel-based (per-pixel classification) approach using the maximum likelihood classifier in ERDAS Imagine and  an object-oriented approach with a nearest neighbor classifier in eCognition. These classification approaches are compared below.

The table below shows that the overall accuracies of pixel-based and object-oriented classifcation methods were very similar.   However, by comparing to some known areas’ land cover type, we accuracy of the object-oriented approach was a little higher, while the 3 by 3 majority filtering using the pixel-based approach in ERDAS is a little more realistic.

Comparing the two classified maps using these two approaches, we also found the object-oriented classification maps look more homogeneous, whereas pixel-based maps look heterogeneous. To some extent, the object-oriented map looks more promising.

CITYgreen Application >>

Satellite-Aided Field Forestry Applications

k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN)

Forest Disturbance Mapping

Oak Wilt Detection

Urban Forest Mapping

TCMA Classification Comparison: MLC vs. kNN

In this section...

Classifying land cover

CITYgreen application